Three cheers for us!

Congratulations to Jack Layton and the Federal NDP, who have now successfully sheparded their climate change accountability bill into Third Reading.
Well done!

harmonized sales tax

Its time for the BC Liberals to admit to what the HST really is. Its an attack on the health of British Columbians. Colin Hansen, Gordon Campbell and the rest of the BC Liberals have told us that the HST will be used to pay for the BC health care system. Maybe it will, maybe it will not. What the HST certainly will do is make it more likely that those health care services are going to be needed by British Columbians. The harmonized sales tax increases the cost of many of the activities we take upon ourselves in order to stay healthy; gym memberships, sports fees, healthy groceries and even life saving safety equipment will all increase in price thanks to the harmonized sales tax. The HST also punishes people for thinking of being environmentally friendly. Many people walk, bike or ride public transit to get to work, which is healthier for both people and the environment than taking private vehicles. The HST increases the price of transit fare, transit passes and bicycles, making it less cost effective to use those forms of transportation. This is going to create a more sedentary society that will suffer from increased health risks. Its insanity that the BC Liberals are going to use the HST, which they admit will bring in less government revenue, to pay for a service that will be used more because of that same tax. Please, tell your local MLA to vote against this attack on your health, vote against taxing healthy living.

Education by the numbers

Today was the opening day of a new session of the BC Legislature. I for one am glad that the representatives of the People have started to go back to work; the vacation they were able to enjoy was not one that their constituents were able to have, as most of us had school or jobs that required our daily attention.
Speaking of schools, today's floor debate centered around that very topic. It would have been a very informative debate, one that the people of British Columbia deserve to hear. Except that the governing BC Liberals didn't bother showing up with anything other than stock answers.
As it turns out, there isn't anything that is going to be done about the rampant school closures that have already occurred throughout the province. There's also nothing planned to help save the schools which are slated to be closed in the next couple of years. These school closures continue to hit our rural communities the hardest; these places are already losing people and skilled labour, and without schools there is no way to replace those who are leaving. But, don't let that worry you! Minister MacDiarmid has assured us that those students who still have a school to go to will receive more funding than ever before. The only problem here is just making sure they have a school to be taught in.
Of course, getting to an open school isn't the only problem for today's students. Once they're in the buildings, students are finding themselves in more crowded classrooms than ever. This government created legislation that specifically outlines the size and composition of British Columbia classrooms. What this government has failed to do is to enforce this legislation. Since the legislation has passed, there has been a forty-five percent increase in the number of British Columbia classrooms that violate those size limitations. The same can be said for the number of classes that exceed the limit of personalized education plan students. Forty-five percent increases are an indisputable number, with some districts reporting a more than one hundred percent increase in these violations.
Once again, the only line that the BC Liberals are willing to give is that funding has continued to increase per student, even as enrollment rates have declined in the province.
I have a problem with this Government meme about funding increasing. Mainly that it doesn't reflect reality. If you surveyed the various school districts in British Columbia, you would find it nearly impossible to find one that is not seriously in debt for the upcoming fiscal year. School districts are mandated by law to pass balanced budgets, so this has caused incredibly cruel cuts to be made to school budgets, cuts that affect our children's ability to learn in a productive environment.
Of course, this is probably news for the Liberals and particularly for Minister MacDiarmid. The minister, when asked about her portfolio and specifically the cuts her department has downloaded onto the school boards, began a pleasant, and utterly irrelevant, discussion about how children in some schools are learning the value of saving money to help Haiti. This is an admirable goal being expressed by the children. I wonder how amazed they would be if someone started asking them to save up so they could pay to get through the second grade this year; its more of a possibility than the BC Liberals would like to admit, thanks to their shameless handling of the education portfolio.
BC Liberal promises have fallen by the wayside over and over again, and in no area has this hurt more than in education. Minister MacDiarmid has promised that education funding will be a priority for this government. I sincerely hope that this time, the BC Liberal promise will mean more than empty words and a slashed budget.

I come today from the budget debate and the remains of yesterday's debate on education. The update from here on are straight from the hansard debate; I can only hope that the people speaking weren't actually saying something else.
Today's budget was absolutely schizophrenic in terms of the money earmarked for our education system. We have been promised continued increases in funding, and yet at the same time the Finance Minister is challenging our school districts to find even more cuts to make, cuts that our education system simply cannot afford. This government doesn't seem to be aware that there is nothing left to cut, that we are now at the point where teachers are losing their jobs and entire buildings are being sold off just to maintain balanced budgets for our school districts.
That is what a BC Liberal promise for increased education funding looks like; it looks like cuts to our school's services and it looks like reduced quality of our education system. Where is this increased funding? Its surely not going to the people and places that need it most desperately.

I love insanity

I wonder if Mr. Chris Hanzek would like to cite those studies that claim abstinence reduces unwanted pregnancies and STI transmission rates. I know for a fact that he is wrong, but it would be interesting to see what reality he exists in where his comments hold up to scrutiny. Looking to our southern neighbours, for the first time in over a decade, the Centers for Disease Control note that teenage pregnancy rates and STI infection rates are increasing. Interestingly, this coincided with the mandate of abstinence-only education brought to America by then-President George W. Bush. It may be hard to believe, but there appears to be a correlation between abstinence-only education and rising rates of teen pregnancy and STI transmission. The studies I cite do not show the extent of the problem, as pregnancy rates do continue to diminish into 2005, as students who were originally given comprehensive sex education age out of the system, or they remember what they were taught prior to the imposition of the new ideological agenda.
Mr. Hanzek claims that you don’t really need a study to show that telling people not to have sex and then hoping for the best works better than ensuring that young people have the information needed to make informed choices, and then giving them the tools needed to stay safe. Unfortunately, reality would tend to disagree with him. Perhaps we really do need such a study, so that biased, utterly incorrect information such as that being peddled by Mr. Hanzek and Ms. Stilwell can be debunked and our children can still get the information they need to stay safe and STI free.
Below are citations of actual studies taken on the subject, showing that abstinence-only education does not reduce unwanted pregnancy or STI transmission rates.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00053654.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/infosheets/infosheet_teen_pregnancy.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/infosheets/infosheet_teen_pregnancy.pdf

Words and actions, differentiating again

The BC Liberals have made a lot of noise in recent months, talking about how they are continuing to fund health care and education even in the midst of the economic downturn that they claimed would never affect British Columbia. It would be a change of pace for the BC Liberals if the words they gave us matched the actions they took in the Legislature. We have been told rather continually that education funding per student has not lowered under the BC Liberals, and has instead increased. If this is true, and by all means there is a lack of evidence to support their case, then how can they explain the dozens of school closures that have occurred across every school district in the province? These closures do not reflect the claimed priorities of the BC Liberals, and they most certainly do not represent the wishes of the people, who rely on these schools to foster stronger communities and educate our province’s future professionals.

The failure here is from the Ministry of Education, and especially its current Minister, Dr. Margaret MacDiarmid. Vague platitudes about the Throne Speech’s plan to create all day kindergarten and ‘bold strategies to renew the delivery of education’ do not replace schools that we have already lost. To be frank, adding full day kindergarten adds a further burden to school districts that already face budget shortfalls. Where will the money come to pay for all day kindergarten, as the BC Liberals have promised to deliver. Certainly, it is within their power to create all day kindergarten, their legislative majority would allow it. So, perhaps local MLAs would like to tell the population where the money for such a program will come from. Perhaps it will be more appealing to the BC Liberals to tell us why they can’t pass their legislative promises that are in highlighted in the Throne Speech, promises that were highlighted by the Minister in charge of the portfolio in question.

The Liberals keep claiming that education is one of their highest priorities. Our Premier promised that we would become the best educated place on earth under his leadership; this is a difficult claim to make when his leadership has led to the closure of so many schools. It is time for the BC Liberals to create commonsense, workable plans for our education system, one that takes into account the needs of everywhere in British Columbia, and a plan that is based on reality. The pipe dream they are selling the people now is just that, a pipe dream that is nowhere near becoming a reality.

Poverty revisited, how to kill the beast

To eliminate poverty, we must find jobs for those who are underemployed. Not just any job, these must be jobs that pay a livable wage that ensures all the essential needs of the person are covered; a shelter, food, water, and clothes. Unfortunately, there are not nearly enough jobs for everyone to have, and there are also sadly not enough homes to put those people in as shelters. Society has become enamored of the idea of building large single dwellings that would house the rich, while blatantly ignoring the plight of the poorest in society. These buildings are an inefficient use of municipal land space, as the population density of these buildings is much lower than of condominiums or other affordable housing. These buildings could be replaced with condominium towers that could then be used to house larger numbers of homeless people for the same cost and revenue produced by a single larger home.
Of course, the inner cities have a different problem, in that the condominium spaces already being created are devoted solely for high income persons, and are not designed to be used as cooperative or subsidized housing. This is disappointing, as it is the inner cities where such a program of housing subsidization would be most effective. The solution here is to allow governments to subsidize part of the rental costs of the unit, so that lower income citizens can also be considered for occupancy of current housing projects.
What I propose is that those persons who are in the two lowest income tax brackets or are currently searching for employment be allowed to join construction crews who are specifically tasked to the construction of government-owned cooperative housing. These low income persons would be joining crews of regular construction personnel and would be given the training needed to occupy a construction zone safely. The goal of such a project is twofold; to first give these persons a wage and therefore an ability to consume goods and contribute to the tax base of the province and secondly to provide these citizens with a stable home and job from which they can wean themselves off of government assistance. These cooperative housing projects, once completed, would be rented out in a fashion similar to privately developed property, except that the owner would be the Provincial Government which could charge rates equal to the fair market value of such a space, with subsidies available for those in lower income brackets, ensuring that over time, the project becomes a net asset to government revenue.
Completed projects would of course be open to all citizens who could pay the fair market value for the apartment, but preferential treatment would go towards those who worked on the construction project. Further preferential treatment would be given to those who work on the project by means of further reducing rent payments per month and through on site job placement counseling. This specific service would ensure that those who worked on the original project would not be condemned to returning to poverty immediately after completing work, and would instead be able to find a new job that would continue to pay a living wage necessary to survive in their new home.
Obviously, there are certain issues that must be worked out from both a political and economic viewpoint in order to adequately fund and complete these projects. First, from a political standpoint, the Provincial government must be willing to accept high initial costs that will eventually be offset by the new stream of revenue being produced by the government owned housing complexes. Particularly in the current recession, this is difficult to do thanks to the rising deficit and the unwillingness of being portrayed as spending limitlessly. Political will and leadership will be required here, as the long term benefits may not immediately be seen by the party that enacts this policy. This should not be a consideration, as improving the lives of the people these projects would affect is the primary concern.
Secondly, the problem of hiring on new people to construction firms, particularly those who would not initially be trained to participate in such an occupation. There are legitimate safety and organizational concerns that could be brought up by current employees, specifically related to lack of specialized training and the appearance that non-unionized labour was being created from the working poor to replace those who already worked for the company and have been retained for long periods of time. Any form of this legislation would have to pass a clause stating that this new labour source would have to be used as a supplement to the regular construction crews, and could not be used as lower waged replacements for long tenured workers. To this end, the new workers could be paid ten percent less than the unionized and tenured crew staff, in order to ensure that fairness in the workplace is respected while still ensuring adequate financial stability for the new crews.
Corporations themselves would balk at such an enormous cost to their operating expenses, which could be appeased through a large, targeted tax cut specifically for those companies that decide to embrace the program. Furthermore, these companies would, naturally, be awarded the contracts to build the housing projects, but would also receive preferential treatment in the bids for other construction processes for the next twelve calendar months, to ensure that profits, and additional projects for local employees, continue to rise instead of stagnating.
This once again brings us to the problem of preventing government budgetary collapse, particularly in the middle of a recession. It is this author’s opinion that nothing should immediately be done to recuperate the cost these projects would impose upon the fiscal situation of the province. These imbalances, which would spike in the initial part of the project, would continue to decrease over time, while revenue would remain steady and begin to increase as more tenants enter the projects at market value and more projects are completed. This would cause revenues to increase at a vastly superior rate to the declining cost of expenses, eventually reaping into a budgetary asset as opposed to a liability.

Proud of who we are, yet no respect from our peers

Our schools are accepting baseless discrimination even while being ordered to comply with non-discrimination policies towards queer youth. Bullying towards the queer community is still prevalent in British Columbian schools, this in spite of the Ministry of Education requiring all school districts to create codes of conduct that enshrine non-discrimination against queer persons. The BC Liberal Government prefers to wash their hands of the issue, claiming that there is ‘no evidence’ that school boards aren’t working to comply with the Ministry order. This is difficult claim to make when fewer than ten of the sixty school districts in British Columbia have complied with the order, and why should they? The Government has shown that it’s not interested in actually doing anything to aid queer youth in the schools; there are no penalties for failing to update the district codes of conduct to reflect the new policy, and the results speak for themselves.
Just in British Columbia, over sixty percent of self identifying queer people admit to facing verbal abuse from their peers because of their sexual orientation, while anywhere between thirty and fifty percent face other forms of harassment at schools. In addition to these startling numbers, over seventy-five percent of queer youth report feeling unsafe in our schools, and shockingly, twenty-five percent admit that they have been physically harassed because of their sexual orientation. Children are in our schools to learn, and they cannot learn when they fear for their safety. This is an issue that is far beyond simple divisive politics, this is about making sure our children, all our children, are able to grow and learn in a safe environment without fear of being attacked because of who they are or who they are perceived to be. This harassment doesn’t come without substantial emotional and physical harm to the children that it is inflicted upon. Queer youth who report harassment are over two hundred and fifty percent more likely to intentionally harm themselves, three hundred percent more likely to seriously consider suicide and are four hundred percent more likely to attempt suicide.
The BC Government has made a good first step, allowing the elective Social Justice 12 course to be taught in BC schools. But this is not an issue that should be elective for students to avoid until their last year of public schooling. Even when we don’t see them in the classrooms, there are queer students all around us in the school system. How do we as a society accept that we are a fair and equal society when we refuse to teach our children that the myriad sexual orientations and gender identifications are not only natural, but are just as ‘good’ and ‘proper’ as heterosexuality? What is equal about celebrating the child with heterosexual parents and then going silent when meeting a student’s two fathers? If this government is truly dedicated to aiding queer students and erasing the pain and suffering they face in our schools, they will enact legislation and policies that not only make queer friendly literature available to all students in an age appropriate manner, but they will make sure that it is not as an elective, but as a requirement to graduation, just like non-discrimination lessons are required for racism and sexism.
It is long past time that we stop ignoring the signs as juvenile teasing and start accepting that homophobia is still a prevalent part of school society. British Columbians pride themselves on how open and accepting we are, so now it is time to start backing up our words with action, and end homophobia in our schools.

Greenhouse Gas fail

January 31, 2010 should go down in history as the turning point of the Federal Government, the day the Conservatives finally went too far in pushing Canadians away from the values they share. That was the day the Conservatives, led by Environment Minister Jim Prentice, announced Canada’s greenhouse gas ‘reduction’ targets to the United Nations and to the rest of the world. The numbers are depressing for their lack of courage and their inability to impact the global climate crisis. For those not in the know, the Conservatives have decided that a mere seventeen percent reduction from 2005 levels is all that this government is willing to do. Unfortunately, this is not nearly as laudable a goal as they would have you believe. Most of the rest of the world has decided to use 1990 as a benchmark, and if we were to use the same then we would actually be committing to a three percent increase of 1990 levels as the benchmark for our so-called greenhouse gas ‘reductions’.
It is a shame that our apparent reductions will still be a net increase from our 1990 levels and that there was seemingly no input from the scientific community regarding the Conservative Party’s proposed commitments, particularly in light of how much public support there is for Canada to pull its weight in the global struggle. A 2009 poll from Angus Reid shows that a firm majority of voters support climate change legislation, including a legally binding international accord. Yet another large majority of voters, this time from just the province of British Columbia, a battleground province in federal elections, say that protecting the environment should take precedence, even over economic growth. The polling landscape clearly shows that Canadians and especially British Columbians care about the environment. Stephen Harper and his Conservatives should remember that when they present their lackluster emission targets. Perhaps if scientists had been allowed to contribute to the discussion instead of big oil, there would have been harder targets in place, targets that would have actually made a difference in reducing human impact on the environment.
Harder targets are needed, and it has become apparent that the ruling party does not consider the environment an issue worth their time. These substandard emission caps will not change Canadians’ impact on climate change, but there is another way to make a significant impact on the world stage. Bill C-311 is a private member’s bill that will once again be sent through Parliament once it is back in session. This bill, which has not been drafted by the Conservatives and has never once received support from the Conservative caucus, includes harder caps that are backed by real scientific consensus. Please call your local Member of Parliament and urge them to support Bill C-311 once it returns to Parliament, it is our chance to tell Harper and his Conservatives that his emission caps are not good enough for the world and certainly not good enough for Canadians.

Lament of the priviliged

I wonder if anyone notices the things I notice anymore. Look around you, middle class of the West. We're having a whole dialogue without even seeing each other, sometimes without even having met each other. We live in such exciting times, where technology continues to make our lives so much simpler than they were, so much better than they were.
Except for the people we've left behind, the people who don't have what we have, who can't have what we have because the money simply isn't there. Things haven't gotten better for them, things haven't even stayed the same for the poor. This is our shame as a society, or it should be our shame. These people, they are no different from you or I, save for the circumstances of their lives. But to see how we treat them as a society and as individuals how we react to them, you would think there was something wrong with them. Its wrong. Its not the Canadian way. Its not what my grandfather fought and died for. We have, and without cause, forsaken them in our quest for a simpler life.
Earlier this week, I encountered someone who exemplefies my point exactly. I say encounter since we never got to talk, never got to understand and introduce ourselves to the other. He simply passed through my life, without knowing the impact he made that night. He was a panhandler, you've seen them everywhere and he was no different from any other. He wanted to wash the car I was in, my partner and driver suggested that he move on and that she wasn't interested. What struck me was how he responded. There wasn't a mean or selfish thought to him, all he said was God bless us, and he moved along without asking for a single thing from either of us. Here was this person, a person with far less than either occupants of the car, and rather than begging or demanding something, he simply accepted his fate without protest. It shocked me. I got to really look at the person before he left my field of vision, and for the first time in many years, I knew fear. Not fear that he would cause me harm, I could see he wasn't that kind of person. No, this was a more basic fear, this was a fear that I could have been that person. He looked like me, and it made me realize that it could have been me, and that maybe in another life it was me. Here was someone who was not even in the prime of his life, forced to curtail any possible potential he may have had simply so that he could find food and shelter for a cold winter's night. I tried to find him not even half an hour later; it breaks my heart to know that the person in question was gone, and so was the police vehicle I had spotted in that same area in my initial passage through the area. I can never know what actually happened, but it breaks my heart to think that this person, a child in reality and no older than myself, could have been taken away for doing what was necessary in order to survive.
How can we, as a society, accept such things as a reality? We have so much, and the homeless and destitute have so little. How can we accept a society and a reality that has children grifting in order to survive through the night. What does it say about us as a culture where, instead of offering aid to these people, we treat them as though they were beneath our contempt. As young children, we were taught simple lessons by our parents and by our schools; be kind to others. Share what you have. See the best in people, instead of the worst. But somewhere, we all in society have forgotten those simple, classic messages. I look to you, my readers, to help change this. You are the future, we all remember those lectures and lessons in some fashion or another, now is the time that we have to start acting on them instead of betraying the promises we made to our families. Because these people are our family too, we are all family in this world and what we have done is to let down those members of our family who aren't as lucky as we are. We need to start being kind to these people instead of fearing them. We need to start sharing what we have with them instead of hoarding what we can spare to people in true need. we need to see the homeless as people, not as things to be avoided. In this way, we can form a more perfect world, one where no one need fear being left alone, left without a means of reaching their potential.
I call on you all, my readers and my friends; stand up and look around. Look at what we have wrought in this world, what we claim is an equitable society but in reality leaves more and more of our most vulnerable behind. Change a life. All it takes is one person to change a life and save our poor from the worst of life. Help me, help them, help our society reach its potential.

Unqualified Nominee to social work board

A woman by the name of Heather Stilwell has recently been appointed to the BC College of Social Workers. This is a disappointing appointment that will drag British Columbia back into the past, not further into the future. Miss Stilwell is or has been a member of five separate anti-abortion groups, and has spent decades trying to take away a woman’s right to choose. She was also a former leader of the Christian Heritage Party, which emphasizes extreme right wing social viewpoints. Of course, this is the nominee of BC Liberal Minister Mary Polak, so there isn’t as much surprise about the nomination, considering the two of them worked together as members of the Surrey School Board to try and ban books depicting same-sex couples in a positive manner. Her tenure on the Surrey School Board was categorized by her extreme positions. Perhaps her most damning work on the school board was her vote to ban sex education and condom distribution in Surrey classrooms. Studies have shown that sex education and easily obtained condoms reduces the rate of accidental pregnancies and STI transmission, but those facts mean nothing for Miss Stilwell, whose right wing agenda would rather pass on ignorance to students, rather than giving them the tools they need to make informed decisions regarding their sexual health.
The nominee has taken other controversial positions in the past, positions that will not resonate with the majority of British Columbians. Among her more outstanding beliefs are the ideas that global warming is not real, going so far as to pass a motion that if Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” is shown in classes, videos which dispute global warming must also be shown, regardless of their scientific merit.
Members of the College are appointed to the board for a single year, but in a year much can be done to reverse the gains our society has fought for decades to achieve. Write to Minister Polak and tell her that it’s not acceptable for her to nominate her unqualified friends to sit on a board that determines the work of our social workers. Give us a nominee and a board that will do its work without a hidden agenda Minister, not one that can impose your own right wing worldview on the rest of us.

BC Liberals hide shameful record of failure

This year’s BC Progress Board report contains the usual prerequisite good news that the Liberals can point to as showing that they have indeed been doing things in the past eight years other than lining their pockets full of taxpayer dollars, but there are some numbers within the report that need to be discussed, particularly because of how badly they reflect on our province and how the future is looking less promising for our youths instead of more promising.
British Columbia currently has a very high ranking among the provinces of Canada for people under LICO after taxes. By comparison to the rest of Canada, British Columbia has the highest percentage of families under the Low Income Cut Off after taxes, with the rate approaching twenty percent in major urban areas. This level of poverty comes as average wages are the third best in the province, demonstrating that the average is almost entirely based on increases in the top earners’ salaries and not on a benefit to those people who need the money the most in society. This level of poverty is unlikely to improve, as British Columbia’s high school graduation rate is continuing to decline, this year reaching a new low of only 70.5% of high school seniors being projected to graduate from high school this year. Combined with statistics showing a mere 49% of aboriginal students graduating within six years at a secondary school, future generations appear to be saddled with an increasing risk of falling into poverty, as the board itself notes in its reasoning for tracking high school graduation rates. What is most disturbing about this statistic is that, as with most other areas of development in British Columbia, it is rural BC that loses out and has the lowest graduation rates, excepting Victoria, which appears to be an anomaly among urban centers in the province. Poor education scores in rural British Columbia are not limited to secondary school graduation rates. This same study has shown that citizens in rural BC are less than half as likely to obtain a post-secondary degree as their urban counterparts.
The rural to urban divide continues in other areas of BC development. Life expectancy continues to be an issue for rural British Columbia, with life expectancies almost two years lower in rural BC as compared to urban areas. Rural British Columbia is also failing to produce as many new businesses as the urban areas, with the per capita rate in rural BC being less than fifty percent the rate for Vancouver and other urban areas in the province.
Of course, there are a few places where the urban and rural parts of the province are being failed equally badly by the BC Liberals. Our children are being failed by the government right from the moment they are born, with a greater percentage of live births being underweight than ever before. This can only come from the fact that there is less primary care available to mothers during their pregnancy period, no doubt a side effect of the Liberals’ cuts to health care funding. Personal and property crimes are also well above the national average and have not been improving either. Vancouver, as a city, was ranked sixteenth among seventeen large urban centers for crime, and the rest of the province does no better, being ranked as the second worst province for personal and property crimes. A very small solace can be taken for urban British Columbians; whatever crime they have is much worse in rural BC, with personal and property crimes being sixty percent more likely to occur in rural BC than in urban British Columbia.
The statistics here were taken from the Government’s BC Progress Council.

The rantings of a former Councilor

For someone who’s no longer an elected official, Mr. Evans has an awful lot of grousing to do about how city council does its job. This may come as a shock to him, but Burnaby runs its elections in a democratic fashion, and in this case, the people (you know, those people YOU were supposed to represent) decided that they wanted a BCA mayor and BCA councilors. It‘s an amazing thought to be sure, allowing citizens to vote for who they want to, even if it doesn’t produce a governing system that Mr. Evans approves of, which would likely require him to be sitting as a member. Perhaps if he and his party spent more time presenting a positive set of ideas to the citizens of Burnaby instead of continually complaining about the election results, there would be members of his party on Council. But, they did not, and the voters decided not to have such people represent them at the municipal level. This should be a lesson to Mr. Evans and those like him, but I suspect that instead, he and others like him will simply continue to criticize a government duly elected by the people, the same people who rejected his style of politics and his lack of solutions to the problems at hand.

Prorogation and the death of a bill

To anyone who wasn't hiding under a rock or living in a cave last year, these words will ring familiar; Prime Minister Stephen Harper has prorogued Parliament. Yes, he's done it again, and once again he prorogues in order to prevent the destruction of his party in the face of his own arrogance and plain stupidity. This time it is due to his party's insistance at lying over the events of Afghanistan, for which the Government SHOULD be held accountable. That's how we were all taught a Parliamentary system worked, that all things became accountable to Parliament. This lesson was apparently missed by Mr. Harper, who seems to think that he can prorogue Parliament whenever the media narrative turns against him.
Let's set aside for the moment the fact that this was a blatant attempt to evade the political fallout of the ongoing torture investigations, which are likely to resume once Parliament resumes anyways, and look at what the Prime Minister has wrought. At this time, there were dozens of government bills and several private member's bills that are now going to have to be re-introduced. Many of these, such as C-311 and C-304, were nearing the end of the legislative process and could soon be accepted as law. This is especially damning for Bill C-311, which has now TWICE been passed at third reading and will be denied royal assent by Harper's proroging of Parliament. This is an absolute waste of our time and money, that we have to debate bills multiple times to satisfy the petty urges of a man who claims to be our leader.
Of course, there is always an ironic side to what Mr. Harper and company do, and this is no exception. Just as recently as six years ago, when Mr. Harper sat on the Opposition benches, he decried the Liberals for doing exactly what he's doing here. Funny how these things are forgotten with a short memory, or perhaps a trip to the other side of the aisle? The hypocrisy would normally be enough to bring caution to a politician, but such things are not for Prime Minister Harper, who seems to believe that such things are beneath him. Speaking of beneath him, apparently living up to his own campaign promises is too much of a challenge for the Prime Minister as well. Many of us will remember that the Prime Minister ran his first two campaigns on the idea of bringing transparancy and accountability to the Federal Government. Hollow words from a man who cares for nothing but power, since he's jettisoned that part of his platform just as readily as he's jettisoned everything else he claimed to believe in.
Perhaps this year, voters will look at what they have brought to themselves; a man with no beliefs he won't eliminate in order to prevent his own short term defeat. This has been the face of Canada for five years now, isn't it about time we return to a Canadian government that reflects Canadian values and a Canadian sense of loyalty to its beliefs?

Christmas updates!

Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays and have a productive, happy New Year everyone!
This is likely to be my last blog until the new year arrives, so I apologize for my recent inactivity and my week off. Its been busy the past few days, I've been putting together a group based out of facebook that will be working year round to end poverty by hosting fundraising drives and demonstrations to obtain greater public and government awareness to the problem. Its my hope that we can start making a difference in the lives of the people who have to live in poverty, because in a nation as rich and powerful as our own, no one should have to worry about where their next meal comes from, and no one should worry about survival.
Down in America, the United States Senate has finally passed a bill that would insure an additiona thirty million citizens and would prevent insurance companies from ending coverage if you actually need to use it. This is a monumental bill, one that does what all politics should do, and that is to help the people that we are supposed to represent. It is not a perfect bill, but what it does is help the least fortunate and give them the safety net they need in order to survive and get back on their feet, the same kind of big, sweeping proposal that Canadians need to fulfill to bring our poor, huddled masses back into society and have them live in dignity.
Merry Christmas everyone, enjoy this special time of year and may glad tidings follow you on your journey throughl life.

Copenhagen's end

The Copenhagen summit has finally ended, and the world powers are touting the new agreement they have created, a so-called breakthrough in world diplomacy that will herald a new beginning in environmental protection in both the developed and developing world. Except that it isn't. All that we have received for our years of negotiations and pleading and bargaining is a committment with no penalties to reduce greenhouse gases by an insufficient amount for a time when the politicians who created the goals will long since have retired from public life. This is insufficient and should not be tolerated, and Canada has only itself to blame. We have known since before the Kyoto Accords that something had to be done in regards to how we produce energy and how we treat the planet we live on. That didn't stop Canadian negotiators from doing their very best to cut off debate and to take a hard line position on targets that would do absolutely nothing for the environment, and it didn't do a single thing to stop Prime Minister Harper and Environment Minister Prentice from threatening to give generous exemptions to the Alberta Oil Sands. Canadians can do better, and ordinary citizens have been doing better in spite of their Federal Government, which has failed to represent the will of the majority. Now more than ever is it important to make a statement on the world stage saying that Canada takes its committments seriously, and that we will not be laggards in any way, shape or form in doing what we know is right for our nation and our world. Recently I said that Bill C-311 has been voted out of committee and into Third Reading, we need to do everything in our power as citizens to pass this bill; lobby your elected officials and Senators to pass a bill that says makes sure Canada does what is necessary to do. No more obstruction, no more pnadering to Oil and Gas, its time for all four parties in Parliament to stand together and get it done. Pass the bill and make it law before its too late.

Urban farming evaporating

There's been a lot of use of the word 'sustainability' in the past, but its mostly been in the abstract in terms of policies that could be enacted by a government once in power. There are sustainable things we can be doing right now, but are actually cutting back on. I'm talking about urban farms, which have been slowly disappearing in the lower mainland. This year the Vancouver Parks Board voted to close down the Stanley Park Farm, which was one of two sustainable farms in Vancouver. The other farm, the UBC farm, is undergoing the process of being certified organic and sustainable, and has been reduced in size. These farms and others like them give British Columbians a chance to enjoy locally grown food that isn't filled with chemicals and other additives.

Liberal Accountability going right off the rails

So the B.C. Supreme Court has ordered the BC Liberals to hand over e-mails regarding their sale of BC Rail and the alleged improprieties of the sale.

It seems clear now that the courts, at least, think there is something to be gained from a more thorough investigation into the Campbell government, and its improperly deleted e-mails. We were told during the May election campaign that there was nothing improper done by the BC Liberals in the sale of BC Rail, yet the judge found there was enough probable cause to ask for these records.

So where are they?

Why is it that Premier Campbell and his codefendants are having such troubles giving the court the documents asked for?

What we’re seeing here is a pattern of events showing the Liberals and their allies do not believe they are constrained by the law.

What does it say about a government that only forces its members to resign when they’re apprehended for their wrongdoings, instead of resigning prior to the arrest and avoiding conflicts of interest?

If our government doesn’t have belief in their good faith on a sale bid, how can we trust them to follow through for British Columbia’s interests at any other time? How can we trust them if they continue to act in a manner that flouts the law and the public trust?

The people of British Columbia deserve full disclosure about the BC Rail sale

No more taxes!

The new harmonized sales tax proposed by the BC Liberals, to be put in place for July 1, 2010 is easily the best way to destroy our recovering economy.

On paper, the harmonized tax looks as though it won’t change the cost of any goods as you currently purchase them.

This is untrue.

The harmonized sales tax forces consumers to pay what was previously the goods and service tax on goods that was not previously taxed, thus increasing the price of things such as “non-essential” groceries, as determined by the government.

First and foremost, how do the BC Liberals intend on paying for the tax rebates promised by switching to the harmonized sales tax? The BC Liberal website claims that there will be yet another low income tax credit, just as there is with the carbon tax. It claims that there will be rebates on all new housing projects, as well as rebates for municipalities, churches and other qualifying non-profit organizations. The Liberals state the harmonized sales tax will remove over $2 billion in costs from B.C. businesses. With the Canadian government only giving the province

$1.6 billion to cover the transition to the new harmonized tax, where will the money be found to cover the costs of the rebates, as there is no new government income being created, if you ask the BC Liberals.

So how does the government propose that the taxpayers pay for their own rebates? It seems that there is no answer provided. Make no mistake, this inability to answer where the money to pay for the tax shift is problematic, and could undermine the economic recovery we currently have in place.

Why do we suddenly need to switch to this new harmonized sales tax?

Ever since Premier Gordon Campbell won his first term in government, the BC Liberals have been trumpeting how British Columbia is the best place on earth. There’s no disputing that from me, but if British Columbia is such an attractive place to live and set up businesses, why is the government so interested in suddenly fiddling with the tax system that made us the best place on earth, especially at such a critical moment when the economy is beginning to experience positive growth again.

What do they hope to gain by changing how we pay taxes?

This is just another choice made by the BC Liberals. A choice to protect and help their friends in big business instead of helping the middle class of British Columbia.

No help for B.C. families, just B.C. CEOs.

Say no to the harmonized sales tax.

September Budget Panned

Sorry, I know, its not even close to September anymore, I forgot to add it here.

The British Columbia budget has been unveiled, hoping to spread enough love to citizens and to distract from the furor of the Harmonized Sales Tax.

It’s unfortunate events are not unfolding as the BC Liberals would have preferred they turn out. The budget is a disaster for hardworking, everyday British Columbians; too many benefits for big businesses, not enough help for the working families that make up so much of our province.

We have a budget that cuts payments to our health care system and to our culture and arts, but has money available to give prisoners flatscreen televisions. We have been told income taxes will be cut again to make certain that the HST is revenue neutral, so why is it a family of four will actually pay more in taxes, before factoring in the increased costs of goods and services.

Even for those who are getting a tax ‘reduction’ thanks to the HST will end up paying more; a retired couple making $30,000 a year will actually pay $238 dollars less in taxes, but that will be a small comfort to them when the goods they purchase eat up those savings and more.

The HST will condemn working families and lower income British Columbians to a lower standard of living, just so the BC Liberals can kickback more money to their corporate owners.

This budget will sound the death knell of the middle class, with increased taxes and no new services to show for it. It makes one wonder just what our tax money is being used for, if not for the services that the BC Liberals slashed repeatedly.

US Senate CLEAR Act

Full Text here: http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/copenhagen2009/climate_cantwell_bill.pdf

The bill in question is the newest attempt to provide a hard cap on carbon reductions, culminating in what is being called a 'cap and dividend' system, as opposed to the already know and understood 'cap and trade' scheme of carbon emission reduction.
The main difference between cap and trade and cap and dividend is that three quarters of all government revenue from carbon share auctions would be returned to the citizens in the form of a monthly dividend cheque. Independant analysis indicates that these dividends could reach as high as twelve hundred dollars a month per qualifying individual. The remaining twenty-five percent of the proceeds would be held in a government trust which could be used to finance targetted infrastructure upgrades meant to decrease carbon dioxide emissions and act as a form of economic stimulus.
This is the kind of proposal that we should be getting behind and focusing on for ourselves in the NDP. It most assuredly accomplishes our progressive aims to lower carbon emissions in a safe, economically viable method, and its almost impossible to tar this as a cap and tax regime, considering that the vast majority of people will receive some kind of rebate without having to pay any initial fee. Furthermore, this type of policy, with its reinvestments in the community, gives the party a chance to put some actions to our rhetoric on standing up for middle and working class British Columbians.
The most important part of this bill would be what is done with the money from the carbon share auctions; if the NDP were to champion such a bill it would be necessary to focus on the rebates that would be given to individuals, which could be far higher than rebates from the carbon tax.